RFPs are a significant part of how we do business in the social sector. Foundations, nonprofits, and consultants often rely on them to get/give needed support. But that doesn't mean RFP processes are always effective or equitable.

When are they lazy, ineffective, and even extractive? How can they be useful and generative for both the issuer and respondents?

As is often the case with Peter and Janai, there's room for debate.